Back
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Sudeep – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jagmohan Bansal, J. - The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.221 dated 28.08.2019 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 323, 452, 506, 148 and 149 of the IPC, 1860, and 67-A of Information Technology Act, 2000, registered at Police Station Jandiala, District Amritsar Rural, and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of Compromise Deed dated 29.09.2022 (Annexure P-2).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there were 5 accused in the FIR and police had filed its report against three persons who are petitioners in the present case.
4. In terms of order dated 14.11.2022 of this Court, JMIC, Amritsar, has submitted his report dated 24.11.2022. The relevant extracts of the report as below:-
?'1. The compromise is genuine, voluntary and has been entered into between the parties without any coercion or undue influence.
2. There are three persons namely Sundeep Singh, Lakhwinder Singh and Harwinder Singh in the above said FIR. However, the accused Jaideep Singh and Kanwaljit Singh were declared as innocent in inquiry conducted by SP Investigation, as per statement of Investigation Officer.
3. All the accused are on ba
The court emphasized the limited jurisdiction to compound an offence within the framework of Section 320 Cr.P.C. and the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse o....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the power of the High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences on the basis of compromise between the disputing par....
The High Court has the power to quash non-compoundable offences on the basis of compromise between the disputing parties, especially in cases where the offences are predominantly of a private nature ....
The High Court has the power to quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-compoundable, especially in cases involving non-heinous offences or predominantly private in ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the power of the High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences on the basis of compromise between the disputing par....
The High Court has the power to quash non-compoundable offences on the basis of compromise under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., considering the nature of the offence, the settlement between the parties, and....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the power of the High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences on the basis of compromise, emphasizing the need to ....
The High Court can use inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences based on compromise to secure the ends of justice, considering the nature and seriousness of the of....
The High Court has the discretion to quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on the nature of the offence, the voluntary consent of the victim, and the societal impact of the offence, even ....
The High Court can quash non-compoundable offences on the basis of compromise using its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of the process of any Court and to secure the ends o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
