JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Saif Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., on the basis of compromise, are seeking quashing of FIR No.124 dated 28.12.2018 under Sections 365, 376 and 120B of IPC, registered at Police Station Mehtiana, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-1) and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. In terms of orders of this Court, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hoshiarpur has submitted his report. It inter alia confirms that all the parties and Investigating Officer appeared before the Court and tendered their statements qua compromise arrived at between the parties; the compromise is voluntary, genuine and without any coercion; no accused is a proclaimed offender; all the accused as well complainant have entered into compromise.
3. Learned State counsel on instruction from Investigating Officer and learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that they have no objection if FIR and consequent proceedings in view of compromise are quashed.
4. Relying upon its earlier judgments in 'Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others, (2012) 10 SCC 303' and 'The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others (2019) 5 SCC 688', a two J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.