JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Sukhmander Singh @ Mander Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., on the basis of compromise, are seeking quashing of FIR No.69, dated 13.04.2019, under Sections 376, 506 and 509 of IPC, registered at Police Station Canal Colony Bathinda, District Bathinda, (Annexure P-1), and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. The petition was filed by three petitioners, however, petition qua petitioner No.2 stands withdrawn. This fact stands noted in order dated 17.01.2020.
3. In terms of orders of this Court, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bathinda has submitted his report. It inter alia confirms that all the parties and Investigating Officer appeared before the Court and tendered their statements qua compromise arrived at between the parties; the compromise is voluntary, genuine and without any coercion.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court titled as Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Vs. State of Gujarat and another, reported as 2012 (12) SCC 401, to contend that where there is a partial compromise with some of the accused then also, the proceedings against the said petitioner/accused should be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.