Sachin @ Sachin Ahuja vs State of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1462

ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Sachin @ Sachin Ahuja – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. R.K.Kashyap, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana, Mr. Viney Saini, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Ashok Kumar Verma, J. - Mr. Viney Saini, Advocate appears on behalf of the complainant and files Vakalatnama which is taken on record.

2. Short reply by way of affidavit filed in Court by the State is taken on record.

3. The petitioner has approached this Court by filing this petition under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to him in FIR No.110 dated 3.5.2022 under Sections 406, 420 of the IPC registered at Sector 9, Ambala City, District Ambala.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that there is a land dispute between the petitioner and the complainant. The matter is purely of civil nature. It may at best be a case of specific performance and suit is pending between the parties. But a civil dispute is tried to be given the colour of criminal wrong doing. Learned counsel further submits that nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner and thus no custodial interrogation is required.

5. On the contrary, learned counsel for the State, while referring to its short reply, submits that the petitioner alongwith other co-accused played fraud upon the complainant and duped and cheated the complainant. During the course of investigation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document