JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. Through the instant petition, the petitioner challenge the validity of a notification, as became issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter for short called as the ‘Act of 1894’). Moreover, the petitioner also makes a challenge to the validity of issuance of a notification under Section 6 of the ‘Act of 1894’ besides challenge the report (Annexure P-3), as made in compliance with the directions of a Division Bench of this Court.

2. The above notifications became respectively issued on 27.08.1987 (Annexure P-1) and on 25.08.1988 (Annexure P-2).

3. The writ petitioner earlier instituted CWP No. 3166/1989 before this Court, wherein, a challenge was made to the notifications (supra). The said writ petition was disposed of through an order made thereon on 28.09.1989. The order as made on the said writ petition becomes extracted hereinafter:

“Parties counsel are agreed with Mr. A. Banerjee, Financial Commissioner (Revenue) and Secretary to Government, Haryana shall be asked to go to the spot to examine as to whether the premises of the petitioners deserve, in the scheme of things, to be exempted from acquisition and that whatever b