Gurpreet Singh vs State of Punjab - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 183

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 183

N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Gurpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vijay Kumar Jindal, Mr. Akshay Jindal, Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma and Mr. Pankaj Gautam, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae. Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate for Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

N.S.Shekhawat J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 15.01.2009 and order of sentence dated 22.01.2009, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Moga, whereby the present appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 452, 148 and 149 and were sentenced to undergo as under:-

Under Section 307 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.1000,/-. In default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.
Under Section 323/149 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.500,/-. In default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 days.
Under Section 148 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for one year
Under Section 452 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, he shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month.
Appellant Dharminder Singh
Under Section 307/149 IPC	R