IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. f.i.r. details and compromise (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding quashing f.i.r. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of the evidential aspects (Para 5 , 9 , 19) |
| 4. supreme court guidelines on offences (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition (Para 20 , 21) |
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of F.I.R. 119 of 2022, dated 24.07.2022, registered at Police Station at Damtal, District Kangra, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 307 , 325 read with Section 34 IPC and 25 of the Indian ARMS ACT . It has been asserted that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the F.I.R. be quashed based on the compromise. The statement of the informant was recorded, in which he stated that the matter had been compromised with the intervention of respectable persons of the society and, he has no objection in case F.I.R. is ordered to be quashedin view of the compromise.
2. I have heard Mr. N.K. Thakur learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Divya Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent no.1/State.
3. Mr. N.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.