JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of F.I.R. 119 of 2022, dated 24.07.2022, registered at Police Station at Damtal, District Kangra, H.P. for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 307, 325 read with Section 34 IPC and 25 of the Indian Arms Act. It has been asserted that the matter has been compromised between the parties and the F.I.R. be quashed based on the compromise. The statement of the informant was recorded, in which he stated that the matter had been compromised with the intervention of respectable persons of the society and, he has no objection in case F.I.R. is ordered to be quashedin view of the compromise.

2. I have heard Mr. N.K. Thakur learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Divya Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent no.1/State.

3. Mr. N.K.Thakur learned Senior Counsel submitted that the F.I.R. has been registered for the commission of offences punishable under Section 307 of IPC, however, no serious injury was caused in the present case. There is no likelihood of conviction in view of the compromise. Henc