Beerinder Singh Yogi vs Manisha Chaudhary

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 157

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Beerinder Singh Yogi – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Chaudhary – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Saurabh Singla, V.K. Sharma.
For the Respondent: A.M. Punchhi.

JUDGMENT :

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J.

1. The petitioner alleges violation of the judgment dated 12.11.2013 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 68 of 2008, titled as Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. and Others.

2. The case set up by the petitioner is that the father of the petitioner namely Harbhajan Singh Yogi was a practitioner in Ayurvedic Medicines, who died on 11.12.2009. On 03.11.2022, the brother of the petitioner namely Sukhjinder Singh Yogi along with some persons came to the clinic of the petitioner-Beerinder Singh Yogi and misbehaved with him. It is stated that despite giving a complaint to the police authorities, no action was taken. It is also stated that later on, a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was filed before the Illaqa Magistrate, in which an order has been passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, U.T. Chandigarh, on 25.01.2023, which reads as under:

“(1) Complainant has come present. His presence is marked. Arguments heard.

(2) The complainant has filed the present application u/s 156(3) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for issuance of direction to SHO, Police Station Sector 17, Chandigarh to register FIR u/s 120B, 354, 38