JUDGMENT :

Manisha Batra, J.

1. The instant revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 15.05.2012 passed by learned Rent Controller, Dasuya in Rent Petition No.64 of 2010 titled as Satnam Singh v. Paramjit Singh filed under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short “Act, 1949”) whereby an application filed by the present revision petitioner (respondent in the main petition) for grant of leave to contest the rent petition, had been dismissed and he was directed to vacate the shop described in the head note of the petition (hereinafter to be mentioned as the “demised shop”) within a period of two months and to deliver vacant possession of the same to the petitioner.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to hereunder as per their original nomenclature as given in the main petition.

3. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the petitioner Satnam Singh through his father and General Power of Attorney holder Sh. Balkar Singh filed the above mentioned petition seeking ejectment of the respondent on the grounds that he along with his brother had purchased a plot vide sale