VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Subhash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ritika – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vikram Aggarwal, J. - Challenge in the present revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 10.10.2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Phul (District Bathinda) vide which the application filed by the petitioner (Annexure P-3) for stay of proceedings of the civil suit titled as 'Ritika Vs. Subhash Kumar' was rejected.
2. One Vijay Kumar, who was the father of respondents No.1 and 2 committed suicide on 20.01.2011. FIR No.10 dated 20.12.2011 was registered under Section 306 IPC at Police Station City Rampura, in which the petitioner and respondents No.3 to 7 were arrayed as accused. They were alleged to have abetted the suicide of Vijay Kumar. Vijay Kumar was married to one Parveen Rani, daughter of the present petitioner. From the said marriage, three children i.e. respondents No.1 and 2 and one son namely Gur Parshad were born. Gur Parshad is stated to be in the custody of his mother Parveen Rani. The allegation was that the present petitioner and the other accused used to harass Vijay Kumar. The petitioner was the father-in-law of Vijay Kumar whereas respondents No.3 and 4 were his brothers-in-law
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.