IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Lisa Gill, Ritu Tagore, JJ.
Vikas Deep – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP No. 3684 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 20-04-2023
Abuse of Powers - Removal of President - Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, Section 22, 50 - The court set aside the notification removing the petitioner from the post of President, M.C Jalalabad, and remanded the matter to the competent authority for a fresh decision after considering the entire facts and circumstances, pleas raised by the petitioner, and passing a reasoned order after thorough examination of the entire record within four weeks. The court clarified that there is no expression of opinion on the merits of the controversy as agitated before us and the same is within the realm of consideration by the competent authority. Observations in this order are only for the purpose of decision of this writ petition and are not to be construed in favour or against any of the parties.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, President of M.C Jalalabad, was removed from the post based on allegations of misuse of powers and funds. The petitioner contested the removal, arguing that the exercise was politically motivated and lacked proper application of mind and principles of natural justice. The petitioner denied the allegations and provided detailed explanations for the charges against him.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the impugned order lacked proper reasoning and did not consider the petitioner's explanations and the discrepancies in the allegations. The court emphasized the need for a conscientious exercise in accordance with the law and a reasoned order with appropriate reasoning. The court set aside the notification and remanded the matter to the competent authority for a fresh decision.
Issues: The issues revolved around the removal of the petitioner from the post of President, M.C Jalalabad, based on allegations of misuse of powers and funds, and the petitioner's contention that the exercise was politically motivated and lacked proper application of mind and principles of natural justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of recording reasons for decisions, especially in administrative and quasi-judicial matters, and the need for a conscientious exercise in accordance with the law. The court highlighted the duty of the competent authority to consider all aspects and pass a reasoned order with appropriate reasoning, especially in cases with serious allegations and consequences.
Final Decision: The court set aside the notification removing the petitioner from the post of President, M.C Jalalabad, and remanded the matter to the competent authority for a fresh decision after considering the entire facts and circumstances, pleas raised by the petitioner, and passing a reasoned order after thorough examination of the entire record within four weeks.
JUDGMENT
Lisa Gill, J. - Prayer in this writ petition is for setting aside notification dated 17.02.2023, Annexure P-14, whereby petitioner has been removed from the post of President, M.C Jalalabad (W), Punjab (for short 'M.C. Jalalabad) in terms of Section 22 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 (for short 'the 1911 Act').
2. Brief facts as pleaded in the writ petition are that petitioner was elected as Municipal Councillor, from Ward No. 2 of the M.C Jalalabad, in February 2021 and thereafter he was unanimously elected to the post of Municipal Councilor, Jalalabad on 26.04.2021. It is submitted that petitioner was carrying on with good work for the city of Jalalabad and development works were being carried out by the petitioner in a dedicated fashion. Respondent no.3, it is stated was elected as Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) in the month of March 2022. Respondent no.3, it is stated belongs to the present ruling party and immediately on being elected as MLA, respondent no. 3 started pressurizing the petitioner to work as per his wishes. This was so as petitioner statedly supported the rival candidate belonging to his own party, thus offering stiff opposition to respondent no.3. When the petitioner refused to act according to respondent no.3, he allegedly started making efforts to dislodge the petitioner from the post of President. A frivolous complaint dated 27.06.2022, it is submitted, was lodged by respondent no.3 alleging bungling in the development works by Nagar Council, Jalalabad and Nagar Panchayat, before the Hon'ble Chief Minister, Punjab. Vigilance enquiry was marked on the basis of the said complaint. It is pleaded that petitioner was never associated with this enquiry by the Vigilance and after this one sided exercise, Chief Vigilance Officer, submitted a report on the basis of which show cause notice dated 17.10.2022, Annexure P-2, was issued to the petitioner. Copy of Vigilance Report, it is submitted was not supplied to the petitioner.
3. Details of the Charges against the petitioner was provided along with show cause notice stating that the petitioner is liable to be punished under Section 22 and 50 of the 1911 Act. Three charges were leveled against the petitioner. First charge against the petitioner is that petitioner by misusing his position as President of M.C Jalalabad, had a road carved out in his private property from Ferozepur Fazilka road to Araian Wala Road. The entire land is stated to belong to the petitioner and his family members i.e., brother Parmod Chaudhary with a residential house, a school, multiplex etc., present on the property, all of which is private property of the petitioner/his family. It is alleged that while getting sanction of the site plan of Harkrishan Public School by the petitioner and Parmod Chaudhary, 40 feet road was proposed through khasra nos. 39/11, 39/15, 39/14, 39/13, 39/23 (private land of petitioner), from Araian Wala road for providing access to the school. It is stated that as per jamabandi for the year 2013-14, petitioner and Parmod Chaudhary are owners thereof and not the M.C Jalalabad and neither is construction of this road the responsibility of M.C. Jalalabad. It is stated that as per copy of the site plan provided by one complainant, namely Pawan, present at the spot, no revenue passage is reflected through these khasra numbers.
4. Second charge is that payment of Rs. 4.34 lakhs made to the firm in question, regarding work of P&L interlocking tiles on the berm of the main road from stadium to the drain is bogus as the tiles were not installed on the site and were not found to be so at the time of inspection and no other type of work mentioned in the estimate was seen executed at the site.
5. Third charge against the petitioner is that on checking of record, complainant leveled allegations that oil/fuel was supplied for the vehicles of the M.C Jalalabad from the personal petrol pump of the petitioner. Details thereof from 08.06.2021 to 21.10.2021, were mentione
The duty of the competent authority to pass reasoned orders with appropriate reasoning, especially in cases with serious allegations and consequences, and the importance of recording reasons for deci....
Removal from elected office must be based on clear, substantiated allegations; arbitrary removal without evidence violates principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of conducting a full-fledged inquiry into the charges against an elected representative of the people and the emphasis on the princ....
The grounds for removal of an elected official must be justified under the relevant legal provisions, and removal should only be resorted to under grave and exceptional circumstances.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.