SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1410

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.
Vikas Deep – Appellant 
Versus 
State Of Punjab And Others – Respondent
CWP No. 13108 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided on : 13-03-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Senior Advocate with Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate, Mr. Akshat Dalal, Advocate, Ms.Sanjana, Advocate,
For the Respondent:Mr. Ferry Sofat, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, Mr. D.V.Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate, Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sharma, Advocate

Removal from elected office must be based on clear, substantiated allegations; arbitrary removal without evidence violates principles of natural justice.

Headnote:(A) Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 22 and 50 - Removal of President of Municipal Council - The petition challenges the removal of the elected President based on allegations of abuse of power and misuse of municipal funds, which were found to lack sufficient evidence - Judicial review emphasizes the requirement of adherence to principles of natural justice and the necessity for clear substantiation of charges (Paras 1, 12, 23).

(B) Principles of judicial review - The court highlighted that the authority must not only state the reasons for removal but also must properly consider the responses of the individual facing removal and follow the directives issued by higher courts (Paras 1, 23).

(C) Election rights and tenure security - The court reiterated the democratic principle that an elected office-holder should not be removed arbitrarily and without a corresponding legal basis, reinforcing the importance of protecting elected office terms (Paras 1, 23, 26).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was elected as President of a Municipal Council but was removed following allegations of misutilizing funds and constructing roads on personal property. The initial removal was set aside by a higher court, demanding a reassessment which led to a second removal without sufficiently addressing previous concerns (Paras 2-4).

Findings of Court:
The court found that the removal notification was issued without adequate consideration of the evidence and failed to adhere to the principles of natural justice, resulting in arbitrary action against the petitioner (Paras 24-26).

Issues: The main issues involved the validity of the charges against the petitioner, the procedural fairness in the removal process, and whether the authority's actions complied with judicial directives (Paras 11, 12).

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that removal from an elected office requires clear, substantiated charges, and that mere allegations without evidence do not justify such actions. The process must respect the individual's right to respond to any accusations (Paras 11, 20).

Result: The petition is allowed and the removal order dated 30.05.2023 is set aside.

Table of Content
1. detrimental removal of elected officials (Para 1 , 2)
2. political rivalry and charges against the petitioner (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. procedural arguments on the decision to remove the president (Para 7 , 9)
4. court's scrutiny of removal process and prior directions (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. clarification of abuse of power definition (Para 13 , 14)
6. burden of proof in removal proceedings (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. final decision and order to reinstate (Para 26 , 27)

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. -

Prayer in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 30.05.2023 (Annexure P-20) whereby, the petitioner who is the elected President of Municipal Council, Jalalabad has been illegally and arbitrarily removed from the post of President and in complete violation of the provisions of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 (for short, 'the Act') as well as the settled law.

2. Adumbrated facts of the case are that the petitioner was firstly elected as Municipal Councilor from Ward No.2 of the Municipal Council, Jalalabad in the month of February, 2021 and thereafter, on 26.04.2021 he was elected as President of Municipal Council, Jalalabad unanimously. A complaint dated 02.06.2022 was filed against the petitioner by respondent No.3 i.e. Jagdeep Kamboj alias Goldy, MLA of Jalalabad Constituency to the Hon'ble Chief Minister. It was alleged in the complaint filed that respectable persons of Vidhan Sabha Constituency, Jalalabad brought to his notice regarding bungling in the development works of the Municipal Council, Jalalabad as basic facilities had not been provided to the general public and request was made to hold an enquiry by the senior officer. On the basis of same, enquiry was conducted through Chief Vigilance Officer and then show cause notice dated 17.10.2022 alongwith the detail of charges was issued to the petitioner for taking action against him under Sections 22 and Section 50 of the Act. Petitioner submitted his reply (Annexure P-3) to the show cause notice issued to him explaining in detail all the allegations made against him and thereafter, he filed supplementary reply (Annexure P4) in addition to the reply already filed. Thereafter, the petitioner was removed from the post of President by the respondent-State vide notification dated 17.02.2023. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing CWP-3684-2023, wherein, the Hon'ble Division Bench after hearing both the sides, set aside the notification dated 17.02.2023 vide which the petitioner was removed from the post of President and remanded the case to the competent authority to decide the same afresh after complying with the specific directions given by the Hon'ble Division Bench in the order dated 20.04.2023. Respondent-State after hearing the petitioner again issued impugned notification dated 30.05.2023, whereby, the petitioner again has been removed from the post of President. Hence, aggrieved by the same the petitioner has again approached this Court by way of filing the present petition.

3. Learned Senior Counsel, Shri Gaurav Chopra representing the petitioner has vehemently contended that the petitioner has fallen victim to the political rivalry initiated against him. It is submitted that the petitioner was elected as a Councilor on the Congress ticket and also opposed respondent No.3 tooth and nail in the election of MLA and thus, he earned the wrath of respondent No.3 who started exerting undue pressure on him after having been elected as MLA from Jalalabad Constituency. It is submitted that in order to settle the score with the petitioner, respondent No.3 filed a false and frivolous complaint on the basis of frivolous allegations and thus, a show cause notice dated 17.10.2022 under Sections 22 and 50 of the Act was issued to the petitioner. He has submitted that the petitioner duly replied each and every allegation levelled against him. He has submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are three fold. Firstly that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top