Krishna vs State of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 1798

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1798

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jagjeet Singh, Advocate, Mr. B.S. Rana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mahir Sood, Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate and Mr. Shivam Garg, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Additional A.G., Haryana and Mr. Prateek Rathee, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. - By way of the this common judgment, this Court shall decide the above mentioned two petitions, i.e. CRM-M-44276-2020, CRM-M-5650-2021 and CM-472-C-2021 in RSA-8-2007.

2. Prayer in the above mentioned petitions, i.e. CRM-M-44276-2020 and CRM-M-5850-2021 is for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner, namely, Krishna and Manish Saini in FIR No.563 dated 1.11.2020, under Sections 120-B, 167, 409, 420, 468, 471 IPC, registered at Police Station City Mahendergarh, District Mahendergarh.

3. The arrest of both the petitioners was stayed on 18.2.2021 and, thereafter, the investigation was transferred to the Crime Branch. On 27.10.2021, the learned State counsel stated that the petitioner is not co-operating in the investigation. Again, a date was given for joining the further investigation.

4. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioner-Krishna has argued that as per the allegations in the FIR, registered at the instance of Reader to Deputy Commissioner, Mahendergarh at Narnaul, a complaint was given to the Superintendent of Police, Mahendergarh at Narnaul for registration of FIR against Smt. Reena Garg, her husband Surender Kumar Garg, petitioners-Manish Saini a