JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - The petitioner herein is a tenant. In an eviction petition, filed under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1973 Act'), filed by the landlord, the petitioner has been ordered to be evicted by the Rent Controller vide order dated 25.07.2017, which was, later on, affirmed by the Appellate Authority.

2. Undoubtedly, the Appellate Authority has partially reversed the findings of the Rent Controller on the ground that the Mohitmim of the religious institution cannot get the tenant of the religious property evicted on the ground of bonafide requirement of his grandson. However, the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority have, concurrently, found that the tenanted premises have become unfit and unsafe for human habitation and are required to be pulled down for reconstruction. The Rent Controller appointed the Sub Divisional Engineer (Civil) to inspect the building and submit a report. The Provincial Sub Divisional Engineer, PWD (B&R), Ladwa, submitted a report to the effect that there are some cracks on the backside and left side of the wall. It has further been reported that the conditio