ANIL KSHETARPAL
Taqdir Jeet Singh @ Jagdir Jeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. - In A.V.Papayya Sastry vs. Govt of A.P. (AIR 2007 SC 1546), the Apex Court observed that the fraud may be defined as an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing some unfair or undeserved benefit by taking undue advantage of another. Even most solemn proceedings stand vitiated if they are actuated by fraud. Fraud is thus an extrinsic collateral act which vitiates all judicial acts, whether in rem or in personam. The principle of 'finality of litigation' cannot be stretched to the extent of an absurdity that it can be utilized as an engine of oppression by dishonest and fraudulent litigants. A judgment, decree or order obtained by playing fraud is a nullity and non est in the eye of law. It can be challenged in any court at any time, in appeal, revision, writ or even in collateral proceedings. The relevant paragraphs 20, 22, and 23 are extracted as under:-
'20. Now, it is well settled principle of law that if any judgment or order is obtained by fraud, it cannot be said to be a judgment or order in law. Before three centuries, Chief Justice Edward Coke proclaimed;
"Fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal".
It is thus settled
A.V. Papayya Sastry vs. Govt of A.P. (AIR 2007 SC 1546)
Mrs. Kavita Trehan And Another vs Balsara Hygience Products Ltd.
Tanusree Basu and others vs. Ishani Prasad Basu and others (2008) 4 SCC 791
Fraud vitiates even the most solemn transactions, and restitution is not applicable when the petitioner was guilty of fraud.
Fraud vitiates every solemn proceeding, and no right can be claimed by the fraudsters on the ground of technicality.
Fraud undermines judicial integrity, nullifying judgments obtained through deceptive practices and asserting the rights of adopted heirs against fraudulent claims.
Section 17 of Contract Act Fraud includes acts committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance, or by his agent, with intent to deceive another party thereto or his agent, or to induce him....
Fraud vitiates all judicial acts, and any judgment, decree, or order obtained by playing fraud on the court is a nullity.
A consent decree obtained by fraud is a nullity and can be challenged in any court, reinforcing the principle that fraud vitiates all judicial acts.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.