Back
RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Dharmender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT / ORDER
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) - Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.0069, dated 13.06.2021, under Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and Sections 34/506 of IPC, at Police Station Women Faridabad along with subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 13.12.2021 (Annexure P-2).
2. FIR in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from Compromise Deed, annexed as Annexure P-2. On the basis of the compromise, the petitioners are invoking the inherent power of this Court by praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse of process of the Court and thus, the FIR in question and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed in the interest of justice.
3. This Court vide order dated 04.02.2022 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court for recording their statements, as contended before the Cou
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court may exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between t....
The court's decision emphasized the importance of considering the nature of the offenses, the voluntary compromise between the parties, and the objective of securing the ends of justice in exercising....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the nature and gravity of the crime, as well as the impact on society, must be considered before quashing criminal proceedings based on a comp....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have entered into a compromise in certain types of cases, continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of process of the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have entered into a compromise, continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashing the pr....
The court's decision was primarily based on the nature of the offenses, the voluntary compromise between the parties, and the precedents set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in similar....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise must be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the pro....
The power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, as provided in Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 320 Cr.P.C., should be exercised to secure the ends of j....
Quashing of FIR based on a compromise between the parties is justified when it would secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
