SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1698

MANOJ BAJAJ
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Samay Singh Chaudhary – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate, for the Appellant;

JUDGMENT

Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral) - CM-4472-C-2022

1. This application is for preponement of main appeal as the Executing Court has issued warrants of possession against appellant for 17.07.2022.

2. Application is allowed and the date of hearing is pre-poned to today.

RSA-1194-2022 (O&M)

3. The appellant/defendant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 17.05.2022 passed by appellate Court in Civil Appeal No.91/28.04.2022, thereby affirming the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2018 passed by Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Rupnagar in Civil Suit No.102/30.08.2016, decreeing the suit for vacant possession by way of ejectment, filed by the respondent (plaintiff).

4. Briefly, the facts of the case are that plaintiff (Samay Singh Chaudhary) brought a suit for possession by way of ejectment against appellant/defendant in respect of 1st floor of house situated in Ward No.7 at Chamkaur Sahib, based upon title, and pleaded that in the year 2005, the defendant approached the plaintiff for taking the possession of first floor of his house consisting of three rooms set, including verandah, and the same was delivered to her on rent @ Rs.2,000/- p.m. The said agreement between th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top