SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1694

ARCHANA PURI
Tej Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Ishwar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Archana Puri, J. - Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 25.10.2021 (Annexure P-9), passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, whereby an application under Order 44 Rule 1 CPC has been dismissed. Besides the same, even the the order dated 15.11.2021 (Annexure P-10), has been passed, thereby rejecting the appeal for want of Court fee, as ordered.

2. The material facts are that while challenging the judgment and decree dated 05.03.2020 in case bearing Civil Suit No.209 of 2017 titled 'Ishwar Singh Vs. Tej Kaur', an appeal was filed by Tej Kaur, petitioner/appellant. Along with the appeal, an application was also filed under Order 44 Rule 1 CPC, thereby seeking permission to file the appeal as an indigent person. However, vide impugned order dated 25.10.2021 (Annexure P-9), on the basis of the report having received from the Collector, Kaithal, about the petitioner/appellant Tej Kaur, to be having property measuring 11 kanal 1 marla in her name, it was held that Tej Kaur is not an indigent person, and consequently, the application was dismissed.

3. Vide the same order, the petitioner/appellant was directed to deposit Court fee, as per Rules,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top