SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1689

ARCHANA PURI
ABC – Appellant
Versus
XYZ – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties :Mr. Kanwaljit Singh Senior, Advocate, Mr. K.S. Brar, Mr. Abhishek Sharma

Judgment

Mrs. Archana Puri, J.

The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, thereby seeking quashing/modification of the order dated 01.11.2018 (Annexure P-10) for grant of appropriate visitation rights of the minor and also for the interim custody to the petitioner and his parents.

2. Initially, petitioner-XXX had filed a petition under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act for seeking custody of the minor daughter. Therein, an application for interim custody was disposed of vide impugned order, wherein, it was held that no ground is made out for handing over the custody of the minor child to the petitioner, but however, visitation rights were granted to the petitioner-father.

3. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below for not handing over the custody of the minor child to the father and also granting only visitation rights, XXX has filed the present revision petition.

4. In pursuance of notice issued, respondent made appearance.

5. Learned counsel for the parties heard.

6. The facts, as culled from the paper-book, are as follows:-

7. That, marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top