SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1946

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. LS Lakhanpal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab. for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. (Oral) - Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.71 dated 22.04.2022, registered at Police Station Beas, District Amritsar (Rural), under Section 420 IPC and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professional (Regulation) Act, 2014.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner being a registered travel agent had performed his duty; that the alleged money was said to be paid to the petitioner in the year 2019 whereas the above-noted FIR was got registered in April, 2022; that in fact, the petitioner did not receive any money, but still applied study visa for the complainant for Canada on 03.03.2019, as would decipher from Anneuxre P-3, which had been refused later on. He further contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

3. Vide order dated 23.09.2022 passed by this Court, the petitioner had been granted ad interim pre-arrest bail and directed to join the investigation.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

5. Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Pargat Singh,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top