NAMIT KUMAR
Radhey Sham Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Namit Kumar, J. - This petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order dated 15.09.2022 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal, whereby regular bail granted to them vide order dated 28.08.2020 in case FIR No.260 dated 04.08.2020 under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 IPC registered at Police Station Taraori, District Karnal, has been cancelled.
2. Brief facts of the case are that on 04.08.2020,complainant Ravi Kumar Gupta moved an application before the police alleging therein that his son Akshay aged 20 years had become permanently disabled in a road accident in the year 2017. Sandeep (petitioner No.2) induced the complainant to get his son treated from some big hospital abroad and stated that his brother-in-law RadheyShyam (petitioner No.1) and Amit Kumar, his partner are having friends and business relations in America and Australia and they would assist the complainant in getting the treatment of his son abroad. Believing petitioner No.2, complainant gave medical report of his son to him and a few days later, petitioner No.2 stated that his son would require treatment in a big hospital sit
A. V. PapayyaSastry and others vs. Govt. of A.P. and others
AbhilashVmodkumar Jain (Smt.) vs. Cox & Kings (India) Ltd. and others
AV. PapayyaSastry and others vs. Government of A.P. and others
BimanChatterjee vs. SanchitaChatterjee and another
KumariJuhiRai vs. State of Bihar (Patna) and Jai Krishan vs. The State ofPunjab
Lazarus Estates Ltd. vs. Beasley
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (dead) by LRs. vs. Jagannath (dead) by LRs. &Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.