JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. - Despite the service of notice, the plaintiffs (respondent No.1 to 3 herein) have not entered appearance.

2. The petitioner herein is the defendant No.1 in a suit filed by the plaintiff for grant of a decree of declaration with a consequential relief of permanent injunction and temporary injunction. The prayer clause of the plaint reads as under:-

'It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:-

N. Pass a decree for declaration that the revenue entry be corrected on the basis of Rojnameha Rapat No. 163 and as per succession and also correct the mutation No. 6469 sanctioned on 28.12.1993, correct the entry regarding the actual owner in possession of the agricultural land in question and same be mutated in the name of the Plaintiffs and performa defendants also described in Para No. 1,2,3,&,5,6 of the Plaint.

O. To pass a decree for declaration to the effect that after the correct of the revenue entry by the defendants no. 2, 3, and 4 as per law and rule returned the excess land in question in favour of the Pla