SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1931

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Kamaljit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sudesh Anand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vivek K. Thakur, Advocate, for the Appellant.;

JUDGMENT

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J. - By way of the present revision petition, the petitioner-tenant (here-in-after to be referred as 'the tenant') has laid challenge to the order dated 18.04.2018 as passed by learned Rent Controller, Kapurthala, for provisionally assessing the arrears of rent in respect of the demised shop and also the order dated 04.10.2019 passed by him (Rent controller) qua his (tenant's) ejectment from the said shop and he has also assailed the order dated 23.09.2021 handed down by the Appellate Authority regarding the dismissal of the appeal, preferred by him against the said ejectment order.

2. Bereft of unnecessary details, the facts leading to the filing of the instant revision petition, are that the respondents-landlords (here-in-after to be referred as 'the landlords') filed Rent Petition against the tenant for seeking his eviction from the demised shop, inter-alia, on the ground of non-payment of the arrears of rent by him (tenant). Vide the impugned order dated 18.04.2018, the Rent Controller provisionally assessed the arrears of rent as Rs.1,62,308/- but the tenant preferred a revision-petition bearing CR No.3127 of 2018 in this Court and vide the order Ann

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top