SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1985

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harkesh Manuja, J.
Balwant Singh @ Banta Through His Legal Heirs – Appellant
Versus
Satnam Singh – Respondent
CR-3695-2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 16-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. D.S. Gandhi, Advocate, for the Appellant

The issue of title cannot be adjudicated upon in the eviction proceedings and does not bar the award of mesne profits once an eviction order has been passed.

Headnote:

Mesne Profits - Eviction Order - The court upheld the grant of mesne profits to the landlord despite the tenant's dispute regarding title over the property, stating that the issue of title cannot be adjudicated upon in the eviction proceedings and does not bar the award of mesne profits once an eviction order has been passed.

Fact of the Case:

An eviction order was passed against the tenant for nonpayment of rent and personal necessity. The Appellate Authority granted mesne profits to the landlord during the pendency of the appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the revision petition, stating that the dispute regarding title over the property cannot bar the award of mesne profits once an eviction order has been passed.

Issues: Dispute regarding title over the property and entitlement to mesne profits.

Ratio Decidendi: The issue of title cannot be adjudicated upon in the eviction proceedings, and raising the dispute does not bar the award of mesne profits once an eviction order has been passed.

Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral) - By way of present revision petition challenge has been made to an order dated 26.09.2019 passed by the Appellate Authority, Amritsar; whereby mesne profits @ Rs.7000/- per month from the date of passing of the eviction order dated 03.07.2019 till the decision of the appeal has been granted against the tenantpetitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'tenant').

2. The facts leading to the present case are that an eviction petition was filed at the instance of respondent/landlord (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') against Balwant Singh, who is represented here by his LRs-petitioners, on the grounds of nonpayment of rent and personal necessity. The Rent Controller vide its order dated 03.07.2019 passed an eviction order against the tenant.

3. Aggrieved against the order dated 03.07.2019, tenant filed appeal along with an application for stay of eviction order. During the pendency of the appeal, respondent moved an application for grant of mesne profits. Vide order dated 26.09.2019, the first Appellate Authority ordered payment of mesne profits @ Rs.7000/-per month in favour of respondent. It is this order which has been impugned by way of present revision petition.

4. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that a serious dispute regarding title over the property in question has been raised at the instance of petitioners which is pending adjudication before the first Appellate Authority and as such till the same is adjudicated upon, respondent cannot be held entitled for award of mesne profits, his title being under cloud.

No other argument has been raised.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and gone through the paper-book. I do not find any substance in the argument raised on behalf of the petitioner.

6. In the eviction proceedings pending before the Rent Controller, the issue of title, if any, cannot be adjudicated upon and as such raising of the same at the instance of tenant, cannot be taken to be as a bar for awarding mesne profits by the first Appellate Authority, once an eviction order has been passed against the tenant. In fact, inquiry into title of respondent is beyond the scope of jurisdiction being exercised by the authorities under the Rent Act which can undertake only a limited enquiry so as to adjudicate upon the status of the parties i.e. relationship of landlord and tenant between them.

In view of the above, I do not find any merit in the petition and thus, the same is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top