SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1979

NIDHI GUPTA
Rajinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Amarjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ashok Paul Batra, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Nidhi Gupta, J. - By way of this revision petition modification of impugned order dated 18.10.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Additional District Judge-cum-Appellate Authority, Amritsar has been sought on the ground that the mesne profits fixed is on a very higher side.

2. Brief facts of the case are that in the year 2004 the petitioner was inducted as a tenant in the shop bearing No.34, situated on the ground floor of Bharat Hotel, Building No.11, Railway Link Road, Amritsar (hereinafter referred to as the 'demised premises') on a monthly rent of Rs.1200/-. It is stated to be an oral tenancy, accompanied by delivery of possession. Rent note dated 7 February 2004 was executed by the petitioner-tenant in favour of the respondentlandlord. Subsequently, from 8.8.2013, the rent is stated to have been increased to Rs.4500/- per month. The respondent/landlord filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 and had sought eviction of the petitioner/tenant inter alia on the ground that the demised premises was required by the respondent/landlord for his personal bona fide use and occupation. The Rent Controller vide order dated 31.3.2022 allow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top