SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1986

H. S. MADAAN
Davinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjiv Kumari – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

H.S. Madaan, J. (Oral) - On petitioners - landladies Sanjiv Kumari and Sunita Kumari having brought a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949 against respondents/tenants Davinder Singh and Lakhwinder Singh seeking their ejectment from the demised shop situated at Main Bazar, Urmurh Tanda, Tehsil Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur, notice of that petition was given to the respondents, who put in appearance and contested the petition. Issues on merits were framed. The parties were afforded adequate opportunities to lead evidence in support of their respective claims.

2. After hearing arguments, learned Rent Controller, Dasuya vide order dated 11.4.2022 accepted the rent petition and directed the respondent/tenant to hand over the vacant possession of demised shop to petitioner within two months from the date of order, otherwise the petitioner could get the possession through intervention of the Court.

3. Respondent/tenant Davinder Singh preferred an appeal against the ejectment order passed by the Rent Controller, Dasuya. During the course of those proceedings, the landladies filed an application for payment of mesne profit at the rate of Rs.20,000/- pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top