AMAN CHAUDHARY
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Aman Chaudhary, J. - The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 6.6.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, whereby an application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. by the complainant-petitioner to summon respondent Nos. 2 to 7 as additional accused was dismissed.
Factual aspect:
2. The facts in concise are that on 3.5.2015 at about 10.30 pm, complainant Anil Kumar was going to the house of one Jai Bhagwan for taking his motorcycle. On the way when, he reached in his street, at the same time, accused Vinod and Vickey @ Dinesh, their father Hari Ram, their wives and two sons of accused Vinod attacked him. Accused Vinod gave a farsa blow on his head and other accused inflicted danda, fist and kick blows on his hands and legs. On raising hue and cry by the complainant, Hari Pal @ Mintu, uncle of the complainant and other neighbourhood gathered there and saved him from the clutches of the accused. Thereafter they ran away from the spot with their respective weapons by extending threat to eliminate him. The injured complainant was rushed to PGIMS Rohtak by his uncle. On receiving ruqa, based on the aforesaid statement of the compla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.