SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 610

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J.
Kamaljit Singh - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents - Respondent
CRWP-3213 of 2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 13-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. JS Bains, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hakam Singh, AAG, Punjab.

The concession of parole to a convict is regulated by the statute and the authorities thereunder cannot act arbitrarily and capriciously.

Headnote:

Parole - Criminal Law - The court allowed the petitioner's application for parole, setting aside the previous order declining the parole. The court emphasized that the concession of parole to a convict is regulated by the statute and the authorities thereunder cannot act arbitrarily and capriciously.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought grant of parole for eight weeks to take care of his family members while undergoing life imprisonment for various criminal offenses.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the previous order declining the parole and ordered the petitioner to be released on parole for a period of six weeks, emphasizing that the concession of parole to a convict is regulated by the statute and the authorities thereunder cannot act arbitrarily and capriciously.

Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's eligibility for parole, the grounds for rejecting the parole application, and the statutory provisions regulating the grant of parole.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the concession of parole to a convict is regulated by the statute and the authorities thereunder cannot act arbitrarily and capriciously, and that rejection of the application seeking parole by a convict should be through a well-reasoned and speaking order.

Final Decision: The petitioner was ordered to be released on parole for a period of six weeks from the date of his release on furnishing bail bonds along with two surety bonds to the satisfaction of the learned District Magistrate concerned.

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.

CRM-W-965-2023

1. This is an application for placing on record the medical investigation reports of petitioner's mother, namely, Jasvir Kaur, as Annexures P-2 and P-3.

2. With no objection from the learned State counsel, the present application is allowed. Annexures P-2 and P-3 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.

3. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place.

CRWP-3213-2023

4. Through this petition, the petitioner seeks grant of parole for a period of eight weeks, in order to meet and take care of his family members.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is undergoing life imprisonment in FIR No.167 dated 28.07.2013, under Sections 302, 323, 452, 148 and 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station City Kapurthala, District Kapurthala; that the appeal preferred against the judgment and order of sentence dated 04.10.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, is pending before this Court and that the case of the petitioner for parole was initiated by respondent No.2-Superintendent, Central Jail, Kapurthala, but the same was declined by respondent No.3-District Magistrate, Jalandhar, vide order dated 08.12.2022 on the ground that since the petitioner is involved in a serious crime, there is an apprehension of breach of peace and absconding of the petitioner, if he is released on parole. He further submits that the petitioner has been in custody for the last more than five years and during the said period, his conduct was good and that co-convicts of the petitioner, namely, Gurprit @ Gopi and Amarjit Singh @ Mama, have been granted the concession of parole (though Amarjit Singh @ Mama was found using mobile phone in the jail). Still further, it is submitted that parole is a rule whereas rejection is an exception. He, thus, prays for grant of parole to the petitioner for a period of eight weeks.

6. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order dated 18.03.2004 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Subash vs State of Haryana and another, 2004 (2) RCR (Criminal) 491.

7. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender, inasmuch as, there are many other cases registered and/or pending against him and that the petitioner is not maintaining good conduct in the jail and a mobile phone was recovered from him on 06.11.2022. He relies upon letter dated 17.09.2002 issued by the Office of Additional Director General of Police (Prisons), Punjab, Chandigarh, which states that the convicts who have committed jail offence, their conduct in the jail cannot be considered satisfactory for one year from the date of the offence. Further reliance has been placed upon the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoner's (Temporary Release Act), 1962. He further submits that there are every likelihood of the petitioner absconding, if released on parole, as he is a resident of Village Bullowal, District Hoshiarpur and confined in the Central Jail, Kapurthala.

8. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

9. Respondent No.3-District Magistrate, Jalandhar, in his impugned order has specifically mentioned that the petitioner has applied for parole though his friend, namely, Jasvir Singh, resident of Village Bal Kohna, Tehsil Nakodar, District Jalandhar and though the petitioner is a permanent resident of Village Jandu, Police Station Bulowal, District Hoshiarpur, yet the fact remains that none of his family members, are residing at Village Bal Kohna, Tehsil Nakodar, District Jalandhar. It has further been observed that the petitioner may abscond or commit serious crime, if released on parole.

10. Co-convict, namely, Amarjit Singh @ Mama has been granted the concession of parole vide order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court.

11. Section 3(1)(aa) of the Punjab Good Conduct Prisoner's (Temporary Release), Act, 1962 provides for temporary r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top