IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Karamjit Singh, J.
Ram Murti - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam & Anr - Respondents - Respondent
CR-3309 of 2017
Decided On : 18-07-2023
JURISDICTION - Special Court, Ambala - Special Court constituted under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not have jurisdiction to entertain, try, and decide civil liability in the absence of pendency of trial of offence referred to in Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner received an assessment order requiring a deposit of Rs.1,23,698 for the inspection of the electricity connection. The petitioner deposited the amount along with compounding charges, and the offence with regard to theft/misuse of electricity was compounded. The petitioner filed a petition challenging the assessment order and sought a refund of the deposited amount.
Finding of the Court:
The Special Court, Ambala dismissed the petition, stating that it was not maintainable as the Special Court did not have jurisdiction to determine the civil liability against a consumer in the absence of pending criminal proceedings for the offences under Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the Act.
Issues: Jurisdiction of the Special Court to entertain the petition challenging the assessment order and seeking a refund of the deposited amount.
Ratio Decidendi: The Special Court constituted under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not have jurisdiction to entertain, try, and decide civil liability in the absence of pending trial of offences referred to in Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the Act.
Final Decision: The revision petition was dismissed for being devoid of merits.
KARAMJIT SINGH, J.
1. This civil revision petition has been filed by petitioner-Ram Murti against the order dated 10.3.2017 passed by the Special Court, Ambala (Constituted under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003), whereby petition filed by the petitioner under Section 154-B of Electricity Act, 2003 (for short ‘the Act’) has been dismissed been not maintainable.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner received assessment order bearing No.A33/2014/2 dated 3.1.2014, whereby the petitioner was asked to deposit amount of Rs.1,23,698/- on the basis of inspection, as per which the electricity connection of the petitioner was checked by the officials of respondent No.1 and thereafter the petitioner deposited the aforesaid amount along with compounding charges and the offence with regard to theft/misuse of electricity was compounded.
3. The petitioner being aggrieved by order dated 10.3.2017 has filed the present revision petition, which is being resisted by the learned Senior Counsel for respondents.
4. The counsel for the petitioner submits that payment of assessed amount and compounding charges i.e. Rs.1,39,698/- in total was deposited with the respondents only under protest. It is further submitted that Special Court, Ambala is having jurisdiction to deal with the matter as per the provisions of Section 154(5) of the Act, which authorizes the Special Court to determine the civil liability against a consumer in terms of money for theft of energy. So prayer is made that the present petition be allowed and the special Court Ambala be given direction to proceed further in the matter in accordance with law.
5. On the other hand, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondents while supporting the impugned order submits that the petitioner made payment of assessed amount along with compounding charges and accordingly, the offence was compounded. He further submits that as the offence with regard to theft of energy was compounded, it cannot be said that total payment of Rs.1,39,698/- was made by the petitioner under protest. The learned Senior Counsel for the respondents further submits that the Special Court is having no jurisdiction to adjudicate civil liability under Section 154 of the Act. In support of his contention the learned Senior Counsel for the respondents has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.20842 of 2017 titled as North Delhi Power Limited (now known as Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.) vs. Devinder Singh and Another decided on 4.12.2017.
6. I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the parties.
7. Admittedly in the present case offence was compounded by the concerned authorities on payment of assessed amount and compounding charges i.e. in total Rs.1,39,698/- by the petitioner with the department. So it is evident that no criminal proceedings were pending against the petitioner under Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the Act, when he filed petition under Section 154-B of the Act to challenge checking report dated 5.12.2013, assessment order dated 3.1.2014 and notice for compounding offence of theft of electricity dated 1.3.2014 and further sought refund of Rs.1,39,698/-.
8. In Devinder Singh’s case (supra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court while allowing the appeal filed by North Delhi Power Ltd. clearly held that that special Court is having no jurisdiction to entertain a civil suit in absence of pendency of criminal proceedings of offences under Sections 135 to 140 and Section 150 of the Act and while passing the said order the Hon’ble Apex Court observed as follows:-
The Special Court constituted under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003 does not have jurisdiction to determine civil liability in the absence of pending trial of specific offences under the Act....
The jurisdiction for civil liability in electricity theft cases lies with the Commercial Court, not the Special Court, which handles criminal offences.
Section 135 of 2003 Act deals with an offence of theft of electricity and penalty that can be imposed for such theft. This squarely falls within dimensions of criminal jurisprudence and mens rea is o....
Civil liabilities for electricity theft must be determined by a Special Court, and actions based on provisional assessments are invalid post-exoneration.
Civil Court jurisdiction is barred under Section 145 of the Electricity Act only for matters arising from Section 126; consumers can invoke Civil Court for disputes involving Section 135 liabilities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.