IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.
Saroj Devi - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others - Respondents - Respondent
CM-14838-CWP of 2023 in/& CWP-15963 of 2021
Decided On : 30-10-2023
PENSIONARY BENEFITS - DELAYED RELEASE - A.S. Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab and others, 1997(3) SCT 468; J.S. Cheema Vs. State of Haryana, 2014(13) RCR (Civil) 355
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought the grant of interest on delayed release of pensionary benefits and other benefits after her retirement. The respondent-department fixed the last drawn pay of the petitioner after her retirement, leading to delayed release of pensionary benefits.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the delayed release of pensionary benefits as per the settled legal principles.
Issues: Delay in release of pensionary benefits, entitlement to interest on delayed payments.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the legal principles established in A.S. Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab and others and J.S. Cheema Vs. State of Haryana to hold that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the delayed release of pensionary benefits.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and held the petitioner entitled to interest at 6% per annum on the delayed payments, with a direction for the computation and payment of the interest within a specified timeframe.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.
CM-14838-CWP-2023
As prayed for, application is allowed.
Affidavit of the petitioner filed in compliance of order dated 07.07.2023 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court is taken on record.
CWP-15963-2021
1. In the present petition, the claim of the petitioner is that she is entitled for the grant of benefit of interest on the delayed release of the pensionary benefits as well as other benefits, which were released to the petitioner after her retirement.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.05.2021 but the pensionary benefits were released to her much after the date of her retirement. He further submits that the benefit of second ACP was granted to the petitioner after her retirement and it was only due to the said fact, the pensionary benefits were not being released to her as her service book was not complete by the time she retired from service.
3. Learned State counsel has not been able to rebut the fact that the pensionary benefits have been released to the petitioner in the year 2022/ 2023 as the case may be, though, the petitioner retired from service on 31.05.2021. It is also not a disputed fact that the last drawn pay of the petitioner was only ascertained after the grant of benefit of ACP, which benefit of ACP fixation was done on 04.02.2022 i.e. after the retirement of the petitioner.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance.
5. From the pleadings, it is clear that the respondent-department fixed the last drawn pay of the petitioner after her retirement and her service book was not complete at the time of retirement due to which fact the pensionary benefits of the petitioner could not be released and after grant of the second ACP, last drawn pay of the petitioner was ascertained and fixed and pensionary benefits were released to her thereafter. Details of the released payments have been given by the petitioner in her affidavit, from which details, it is clear that pensionary benefits have been released to the petitioner much after her retirement.
6. Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the petitioner did not submit the pension papers for 10 months.
7. It may be noticed that once, the service book of the petitioner was not complete and her second ACP was released after her retirement, the question whether the petitioner failed to fill the form or not will not disentitle the petitioner for the grant of benefit of interest on the delayed release of payments as the respondents were at fault so as to ascertain her last drawn pay required to ascertain the pensionary benefits at the time of retirement. It is only after retirement, pay of the petitioner was fixed after which, pensionary benefits were released which fact shows that it was the department which was on default for delayed release of pensionary benefits.
8. It is a settled principle of law settled by the Full Bench of this Court in A.S. Randhawa Vs. State of Punjab and others, 1997(3) SCT 468, that an employee is entitled for the release of his/her pensionary benefits within a period of two months of his/her retirement in case there is no impediment, failing which, an employee will be entitled for the grant of benefit of interest on the said delayed release of payments. The relevant paragraph of said judgment is as under:-
“Since a government employee on his retirement becomes immediately entitled to pension and other benefits in terms of the Pension Rules, a duty is simultaneously cast on the State to ensure the disbursement of pension and other benefits to the retirer in proper time. As to what is proper time will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case but normally it would not exceed two months front the date of retirement which time limit has been laid down by the Apex Court in M. Padmanabhan Nair's case (supra). If the State commits any default in the p
AI
An employee is entitled to interest on delayed release of pensionary benefits as per the settled legal principles.
Entitlement to interest on delayed release of pensionary benefits and arrears of salary based on the established legal principles.
Interest on delayed release of pensionary benefits can only be paid if the benefits were withheld without valid justification and without fault on the part of the employee.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.