Back
N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Radha – Appellant
Versus
U. T. Chandigarh – Respondent
N.S.SHEKHAWAT, J.
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also direct the respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 04.04.2023 (Annexure P-4) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their aforesaid representation.
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ankur Bali, APP for U.T., Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the matter and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
7. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other
The court has the authority to direct law enforcement agencies to address matters related to the protection of lives and liberty.
The court affirmed the necessity for law enforcement to address representations made by citizens regarding threats to their safety.
The court can issue a writ of mandamus to compel public authorities to perform their legal duty, such as providing protection and security to individuals in need.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
