SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1067

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Karamjit Singh, J.
Rajesh Kalra - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana - Respondent - Respondent
CRR-669 of 2023
Decided On : 12-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanpreet Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K Sheoran, DAG, Haryana.

Filing a challan without the report of FSL in a case involving recovery of contraband is not to be treated as a complete challan, and the accused is entitled to default bail if the report is not filed within the statutory period.

Headnote:

DEFAULT BAIL - NDPS Act - The court held that filing a challan without the report of FSL in a case involving recovery of contraband is not to be treated as a complete challan, and the accused is entitled to default bail if the report is not filed within the statutory period. The court referred to previous decisions and the requirement of Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act to support its decision.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought default bail in a criminal case under Sections 18, 21C, 22C, and 29 of NDPS Act, as the challan was filed without the FSL report within the statutory period of 180 days.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the challan filed without the FSL report was incomplete, and the petitioner was entitled to default bail as per the provisions of Section 36 of NDPS Act.

Issues: The issues revolved around the completeness of the challan filed without the FSL report, the petitioner's right to default bail, and the prosecution's failure to file the report within the statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by previous judgments that held filing a challan without the FSL report in cases involving contraband as incomplete, and the requirement of Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act for the prosecution to seek an extension of time to complete the investigation.

Final Decision: The court set aside the order rejecting default bail and ordered the petitioner to be released on default bail.

KARAMJIT SINGH, J.

1. The petitioner is seeking default bail in criminal case having FIR No.683 dated 16.08.2022 under Sections 18, 21C, 22C and 29 of NDPS Act, Police Station Sadar Yamunanagar.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution version, the petitioner was apprehended and commercial quantity of medical intoxicants were recovered from his possession on 16.08.2022 by the police and was produced before the Area Magistrate and the challan was presented against the petitioner on 9.2.2023. The counsel further submits that the said challan was filed without the FSL report and therefore, is to be considered as incomplete challan. The counsel for the petitioner further submits that no application was moved by the public prosecutor or additional public prosecutor, as per the provisions of Section 36A(4) NDPS Act seeking extension of time to complete the investigation in the present case. It is further submitted that in the instant case no report was ever furnished by the Public Prosecutor in terms of the aforesaid statutory provision. The counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner’s right to default bail accrued on completion of statutory period of 180 days as per the provisions of Section 36 of NDPS Act. Even on the expiry of the said statutory period, the report of FSL was not filed, so the challan filed by the prosecution on 9.2.2023 is to be considered as incomplete challan.

3. In support of his contentions the counsel for the petitioner referred to order dated 09.08.2021 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CRR No.361 of 2021, Jagvinder Singh Vs. State of Haryana, wherein it was held that the report of FSL with regard to nature of recovered substance would go to the root of the matter and a challan filed without the FSL report with regard to the same would be an incomplete challan and would not satisfy the requirement envisaged under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and the accused in such circumstances would be entitled to be released on default bail. The counsel further relied upon the decision of the coordinate Bench of this Court in CRR-40-2022 Ajaib Singh Vs. State of Haryana, decided on 17.02.2022.

4. The counsel for the State on the other hand contends that there is no illegality in the impugned order. The State counsel further submits that the challan was filed on 09.02.2023 but the prosecution has failed to file the report of FSL till the completion of statutory period of 180 days and resultantly the petitioner filed bail application under Section 167(2) Cr.PC but the same was rightly dismissed by the trial Court. The State counsel further contends that admittedly the challan was filed without the report of FSL but it cannot be termed as an incomplete challan. In support of his contentions the State counsel referred to CRR No.1731 of 2019, Akash Kumar @ Sunny Vs State of Haryana decided on 16.10.2019 by the coordinate Bench of this Court.

5. I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the parties.

6. As per prosecution, the present case is with regard to recovery of commercial quantity of contraband and the petitioner was sent to custody on 17.08.2022. The police presented challan against the petitioner on 09.02.2023 without FSL report. Admittedly in the present case report of FSL was not filed within the statutory period of 180 days. In the meantime, petitioner filed an application for grant of default bail on 22.02.2023. It appears that no application or report was filed by the Public Prosecutor as per the requirement of Section 36A(4) of NDPS Act within prescribed statutory period of 180 days.

7. As per the reply dated 6.4.2023 filed by the State by way of affidavit of Kawaljit Singh, Deputy Supdt. Of Police, Yamunanagar, it appears that even by that date the report of FSL was still awaited.

8. The report of the FSL goes to the root of the case and is a material document and as such, filing of challan without the same is not to be treated as complete chal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top