IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harinder Singh Sidhu, Lalit Batra, JJ.
Kulwinder Singh - Appellant - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent - Respondent
CRM-44173 of 2022 in/and CRA-D-228-DB of 2015 (O/M)
Decided On : 16-05-2023
NDPS Act - Conviction under Section 22 - Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the compliance with Section 52-A of the Act, the deposit of case property in the Judicial Malkhana, and the handling of the case property. The court emphasized the importance of proper storage and handling of case property as per the legal provisions of the NDPS Act.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was charged with and tried for an offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant was found in possession of intoxicant powder, and the prosecution presented evidence to support the charges. The appellant denied the allegations and presented witnesses to support his innocence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was a lack of compliance with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, as the case property was not deposited in the Judicial Malkhana despite the orders of the Magistrate. The court noted that the case property remained in the Police Station without a satisfactory explanation. The court emphasized the importance of proper handling and storage of case property as per the legal provisions of the NDPS Act.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the compliance with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, the deposit of case property in the Judicial Malkhana, and the handling of the case property. The court examined the testimony of witnesses and the procedures followed in handling the case property.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of compliance with Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, which required the deposit of case property in the Judicial Malkhana. The court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed procedures for handling and storing case property as per the legal provisions of the NDPS Act.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, and acquitted the appellant of the charge by giving him the benefit of doubt. The appellant was directed to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J.
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the Judge, Special Court (Adhoc), Fast Track Court, Gurdaspur in Sessions Case No.169 of 2013 whereby the appellant, who was charged with and tried for offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act'), has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 15 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,50,000/- and in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 years.
2. The FIR was registered on the complaint of Investigating Officer/ASI Manohar Singh who stated that on 25.07.2013 at about 5.00 pm, he alongwith other police officials was present on patrolling duty at Bridge Drain, Village Chandu Sujja. At that time, a man was seen coming from village side. He was holding an envelope in his right hand. On seeing the police party, he threw away the envelope and tried to run towards right hand side of drain. He was apprehended by the other police officials. On interrogation, he disclosed his name as Kulwinder Singh alias Maddhar (appellant). On checking the envelope thrown by the appellant, intoxicant powder was found. On weighing, it was found to be 500 grams. Two samples of 10 grams each were drawn. On weighing, the remaining intoxicant powder was found to be 480 grams. The sample was sealed with seal impression 'MS' and same was taken into police possession. Thereafter, he handed over his seal to HC Balbir Singh. He tried to join persons present there as independent witnesses but nobody was ready to join police party. Thereafter, ruqa was sent to police station for registration of case. The sample parcel was sent for chemical examination. On completion of investigation challan was presented.
3. The prosecution examined number of witnesses in its support. The statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded wherein he stated that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He was never involved in any kind of criminal as well as civil case. He was an agriculturist by profession. He was badly injured by Jasmeet Singh, Gurleen, Shamsher and others due to some party faction. On his statement the police of P.S. Chandare registered FIR against the above said persons. Some of police officials of P.S. Fatehgarh Churrian who are relatives of above said accused pressurized him to compromise the matter with accused. He compromised the matter with accused but due to grudge against him, they falsely implicated him in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from him. He examined Amit Dabra, Alternative Nodal Officer, Vodafone as DW1 and Harpeet Kaur wife of Surjit Singh as DW2.
4. The appellant was convicted and sentenced as referred to above. Hence, this appeal.
5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the judgment and record.
6. PW1 ASI Manohar Singh deposed that on 25.7.2013 he was present at PP Kala Afgana, P.S. Fatehpur Churrian. He was joined by HC Balbir Singh and other police officials. When they were present at Bridge Drain, Village Chandu Sujja, one man was seen coming from village side. He was holding an envelope in his right hand. On seeing them, he threw away the envelope and tried to run away from the spot. He was apprehended by the police party. On interrogation, he disclosed his name as Kulwinder Singh son of Surjit Singh. He (PW1) checked the envelope thrown away by accused. It contained intoxicant powder. He took out 2 samples of 10 grams each. On weighing the remaining powder, it was found to be 480 grams. He put the two samples and one bulk of recovered intoxicant powder into three separate plastic containers and sealed them with his seal impression 'MS'. After use, he gave his seal to HC Balbir Singh. The above said case property was taken into police possession through memo Ex.PA. He sent ruqa (Ex.PB) through PHG Gurmit Chand and FIR (E
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following proper procedure in the investigation, ensuring the integrity of evidence, and the need for credible evidence to establ....
(1) Where Police witnesses examined are reliable then prosecution case is not required to be rejected on the ground that independent witnesses were not examined.(2) Statement of witness is required t....
Non-compliance with statutory provisions and the importance of proper seizure and sampling procedures in drug-related cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for compliance with procedural safeguards and fair procedure in the investigation and trial of cases under the NDPS Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.