IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Kulwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
CRA-S-1824-SB-2004
Decided On : 23-03-2023
NDPS Act - Conviction under Section 15 - [POPPY HUSK] - [Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15] - The court discussed the non-compliance of Section 50 and Section 52A(2) of the NDPS Act, the importance of proper seizure and sampling procedures, and the need for compliance with legal provisions. The court found that the conviction was not sustainable due to non-compliance with these provisions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for keeping 30 Kgs. of poppy husk without a permit. The prosecution's case was based on the recovery of the poppy husk from the appellant's vehicle during a police search.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there were deficiencies in the search and seizure procedures, non-compliance with Section 50 and Section 52A(2) of the NDPS Act, and lack of proper evidence to link the seized substance to the appellant.
Issues: Non-compliance with Section 50 and Section 52A(2) of the NDPS Act, discrepancies in witness statements, lack of independent witnesses during the recovery, and the validity of the FSL report.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the non-compliance with statutory provisions and the lack of proper evidence rendered the conviction unsustainable.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was discharged of the charges.
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J. - Present appeal has been filed by appellant - Kulwant Singh, then aged 24 years, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.09.2004, passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Ludhiana/learned Trial Court, in Sessions Case No. 104, dated 28.07.2001, arising out of FIR No. 67, dated 06.05.2001, under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'NDPS Act'), registered at Police Station Sidhwan Bet.
2. Appellant - Kulwant Singh was convicted for the commission of offence punishable under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, for keeping in his conscious possession 30 Kgs. of poppy husk without any permit/licence and was ordered to undergo following sentence:-
Under Section | Sentence | Fine | In Default |
15 of the NDPS Act | 01 year R.I. | Rs. 2,000/- | 15 days R.I. |
3. Case of the prosecution, emerging from the FIR version and referred in paragraph No. 2 of the impugned judgment is that:-
'On 06.05.2011, while patrolling, SI Jasbir Singh alongwith other police officials, was going from Sidhwan Bet to village Leelan. ASI Jaspal alongwith Constable Kuldip Singh met them at the Bus stand ofvillage Leelan. They were also joined in the police party. When the police party reached near canal minor of Sherpur Kalan, then from the opposite side, one tanker No. PB-10H-9818 was seen coming, which was stopped by him. He conducted the search of the tanker and found that one bag containing some material was seen lying near the seat of the driver. Said tanker was driven by the accused/appellant. On suspicion, he was apprehended. SI Jasbir Singh asked the accused/appellant that search of the bag is to be conducted and gave him offer that if he so desires the checking could be done by the Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, but the accused reposed faith in him. Statement of the accused was recorded and thereafter the search of the accused/appellant was conducted as per rules and poppy husk was recovered from the bag. Two samples of 250 grams each were taken out and the remaining poppy husk was weighed, which was found to be 29 Kgs. 500 grams and it was put in the same bag and was converted into parcel. The sample parcels and the bulk parcel were sealed with the seal 'JS'. The sample of his seal on the chits including the chit Ex. P1 and the tanker were taken in possession vide recovery memo."
4. After completing of statutory proceedings, final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was prepared and same was produced before the Court concerned.
After supplying copies of the final report to the accused/appellant and framing of charge under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, prosecution examined total six witnesses, detailed as under:-
PW-1 | Inspector/SI Ravinderpal Singh | He deposed regarding verification of the arrest and seizure, for making compliance of Section 57 of the NDPS Act. |
PW-2 | SI Jasbir Singh | the recovery and seizure of contraband and arrest of the accused/appellant with the help of police associates with him. |
PW-3 | ASI Jaspal Singh | He was member of the recovery/ investigating team. |
PW-4 | HC Lakhwinder Singh | He deposed regarding deposit of case property with him by Inspector/SHO Ravinderpal Singh and making entry in the Roznamcha regarding it. |
PW-5 | Constable Sukhjit Singh | He is a formal witness. |
PW-6 | Raj Kumar, Assistant, O/o DTO, Moga | He deposed regarding ownership of vehicle bearing registration No. PB-10-H-9818, and the entry regarding the same in the office of District Transport Officer, Moga. |
5. In the statement recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C., accused/appellant took a specific stand that case has been planted upon him because he did not accommodate the police officials by providing them the tanker for using the same for sprinkling of water for a period of two hours.
Complete defence of the appellant, under Section 313 Cr.P.C. says as under:-
'Q: What more do you want to say?
Ans. I am innocent. On 5-5-01, one ASI Mr. Chopra and one constable namely Kuldeep Singh had come to my house in the morning at 8.00. They m
Non-compliance with statutory provisions and the importance of proper seizure and sampling procedures in drug-related cases.
Strict compliance with the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly in cases involving the seizure and disposal of contraband, is crucial to establish the integrity of the evidence and the ....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of compliance with statutory provisions, the veracity of evidence, and the benefit of doubt in criminal cases.
Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act and lack of corroboration from witnesses can vitiate the conviction.
The conviction under the NDPS Act was quashed due to failure to comply with mandatory procedures for sample collection, emphasizing the importance of due process in narcotics cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.