JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Ram Singh @ Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioner, through instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 27 dated 22.02.2021 under Sections 363, 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Sections 376 (2) (N), 343 & 506 IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 added later on), registered at Police Station Baragudha District Sirsa.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia, contends that the petitioner, at the time of commission of alleged offence, was 20 years old and prosecutrix was 17 years and 03 months old. The prosecutrix has already been examined as well as cross-examined. She has inter alia deposed that she at her own will left her home and stayed in mustard fields for 05 days without food. The petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2021. It is a case of affair between a young couple and on being caught by family members, the FIR has been registered. The conclusion of trial would take quite long time. The challan has already been presented and charges stand framed. The petitioner has been wrongly implicated in the commission of alleged offence. The petitioner is not involved in any other FIR. The petitioner is permanen
The court considered the age of the accused and the prosecutrix, the nature of the alleged offense, and the prevailing conditions of undertrial prisoners in India in reaching its decision to grant ba....
The court considered the length of custody, lack of medical evidence, and the nature of the relationship between the petitioner and the prosecutrix in granting bail.
The fundamental right of the accused to defend himself while not in custody is a crucial factor in considering bail applications.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21, and prolonged detention without trial infringes on personal liberty.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right, and prolonged detention without trial can lead to the grant of bail.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and prolonged pre-conviction detention without trial is unjust and infringes upon personal liberty.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21, and prolonged detention without trial is impermissible.
Prolonged pre-trial detention violates the fundamental right to a speedy trial, necessitating bail for the accused.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged pre-trial detention without reasonable justification infringes on personal liberty.
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and prolonged pre-trial detention without reasonable cause is a violation of this right.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.