JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Rahul Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., on the basis of compromise, are seeking quashing of FIR No.195 dated 19.09.2022 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 313, 34, 406 and 498A of IPC, registered at Police Station Kalka, District Panchkula and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. In terms of orders of this Court, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kalka has submitted his report. It inter alia confirms that all the parties appeared before the Court and tendered their statements qua compromise arrived at between the parties; the compromise is voluntary, genuine and without any coercion; no accused is a proclaimed offender; all the accused as well complainant have entered into compromise.
3. Learned State counsel on instruction from Investigating Officer does not dispute the factual position and learned counsel for respondent No.2 submitted that they have no objection if FIR and consequent proceedings, in view of compromise, are quashed.
4. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking divorce by mutual consent stands filed which is pending for second mo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.