SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1290

M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, SUKHVINDER KAUR
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. K.D.S. Hooda, Advocate for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Arun Beniwal, DAG, Haryana.

1. This is the fifth application filed under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. by the applicant/appellant-Sunil Kumar seeking suspension of sentence imposed upon him by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palwal, in Sessions Case No.RBT-101 of 2010/2013, pertaining to FIR No.314 dated 18.09.2009 under Sections 148, 302, 216, 120-B IPC read with Section 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Hathin, Palwal, vide judgement of conviction dated 28.05.2013 and order on quantum of sentence dated 30.05.2013.

2. Vide the said judgment and order, the applicant/appellant has been convicted by the learned Sessions Judge for committing offence under Section 302 IPC read with Section 120-B IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of ?20,000/- and for committing offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act, he was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of ?2,000/-.

3. Challenging the said judgment and order, the applicant-appellant has filed appeal (CRA-D-782-DB-2013) before this Court, which has been admitted on 29.07.2013 and the recovery of fine has also been stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

4. As per the custody certifica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top