SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Meenakshi (Dr.) - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.A. 1464 of 2019
Decided On : 01-12-2022




Suspension of sentence can be granted based on circumstances and previous similar orders for co-convicts, with conditions to ensure compliance.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 307, 120B, and 34 - Arms Act, 1959 - Application seeking suspension of sentence - The appellant's sentence was previously suspended, and co-convicts had similar orders of suspension - Court considers totality of facts, ensuring compliance with conditions for suspension of sentence. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence pending appeal - The Court allows suspension of sentence subject to conditions imposed on the appellant regarding contact with authorities and presence in Court.

Facts of the case:
The appellant filed an application for the suspension of sentence under FIR No. 184/2011, which included serious charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act. It was noted that the sentences of co-convicted individuals had been suspended earlier, and the Court recognized the necessity of considering this alongside the appeal's hearing timeline.

Findings of Court:
The Court suspended the appellant's sentence, subject to the appellant furnishing a personal bond and complying with several conditions, reinforcing the necessity of communication with enforcement authorities.

Issues: The key issues included the argument for suspension based on the suspension of sentences of co-convicted individuals and the conditions attached to such suspension.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that given the context and previous decisions of suspension for co-convicted individuals, allowing the appellant's suspension, subject to conditions, was justified to ensure compliance and attendance during appeal proceedings.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

Table of Content
1. suspension of sentence application filed. (Para 1)
2. previous suspensions of co-convicts noted. (Para 2)
3. conditions for suspension of sentence established. (Para 3)
4. application disposed of. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.(BAIL) 2245/2019 (suspension of sentence)

1. The present application has been filed under Section 389 Cr. PC with Section 482 Cr. PC on behalf of the appellant seeking suspension of sentence in FIR No. 184/2011 under Sections 307/120B/34 IPC and under Sections 25/27 of Arms Act, 1959.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sentence of the co-convict Pawan Kumar has already been suspended by this Court in CRL. A. 349/2020 vide order dated 10th August, 2020. It has also been submitted that the sentence of co-accused Dr. Vinod Kumar has also been suspended by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16th June, 2020 in CRL. A. 22/2020. The sentence of the appellant has already been suspended by the learned Trial Court under Section 389 Cr. PC.

3. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances and the fact that the hearing of the appeal may take some time, the sentence of the appellant is suspended subject to furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent/Duty MM, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The appellant shall remain available on his mobile number i.e. 8766378589, which he undertakes to keep operational during the pendency of the present appeal.

(ii) The appellant shall further remain in touch telephonically with SI Gautam Sagar/Duty officer, P.S. K.N. Katju Marg, Delhi on mobile number: 9810446047 as well as IO/SHO, P.S. Vijay nagar, Ghaziabad on the first Monday of every month.

(iii) In the event of change of his residential address/contact details, the appellant shall promptly inform the same to the I.O./SHO, P.S. K.N. Katju Marg, Delhi as well as IO/SHO, P.S. P.S. Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad.

(iv) The appellant shall remain present in the Court as and when appeal is taken up for hearing.

4. The present application is disposed of accordingly.

CRL.A. 1464/2019

Admitted.

List this appeal in due course in the category of 'Regulars' as per the year of its seniority.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top