SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Gram Panchayat Saidpur-Mohmmadpur – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. Respondent No. 3 herein preferred an application cast under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'). In the above application, the respondent herein claimed path measuring 4 karam i.e. 22 feet wide from rectangle No. 10 killa No. 10, belonging to Gram Panchayat, and, whereas the applicant has been given the area of rectangle No. 10 killa No. 2 adjacent land of Gram Panchayat, rectangle No.9, killa No.2 village Saidpur, Mohammadpur, Gurgaon. On the above application, the impugned order, as carried in Annexure P-3, became pronounced. The Gram Panchayat concerned, becomes aggrieved from the drawings of Annexure P-3, and, is led to institute thereagainst the instant writ petition.
2. It is not disputed amongst the parties at contest, that during the course of the consolidation proceedings, rasta or passage was carved by the consolidation authorities for the exercising thereons of easementary rights by all the land holders concerned. One of the land holders one Mange Ram son of Badloo, did not, during the course of his holding a valid title to the land(s) concerned, make any protest to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.