AMARJOT BHATTI
Balwan – Appellant
Versus
Surender – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
1. The appellant/claimant – Balwan has filed present appeal against impugned Award dated 03.10.2012 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani vide which the claim petition filed by the appellant/claimant Balwan has been dismissed with costs.
2. The brief facts of the case are that appellant/claimant Balwan filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for grant of compensation on account of injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicular accident due to rash and negligent driving by respondent No.1 while driving Jeep bearing No.HR-19E-0228. It is submitted that at the time of accident he was 28 years of age. He was doing dairy farming and agricultural work. He was earning Rs.15,000/- per month from both the sources. On the fateful day of 18.07.2008 at about 5 pm, he along with his brother Rajender boarded Pickup Jeep No.HR-19E-0228 from the turn of main road village Atela Khurd for going to their village Dohka Hariya. The pickup jeep was driven at a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner by its driver. He and his brother requested him to drive slowly but he did not listen. When the pickup jeep reached near th
Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Balinder Pal @ Varinder Singh and others
Suman and others Vs. Somveer and others
Vimla Devi & Ors. Vs. National Insurance Company Limited and Ors.
The burden of proof in establishing the cause of an accident and the credibility of witnesses are crucial factors in determining claims for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court ruled that inconsistent testimonies in criminal and civil proceedings undermine the credibility of the claimant, leading to dismissal of the compensation claim under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Claimants in motor vehicle accident cases must meet the burden of proof on a preponderance of probabilities, and strict evidence rules do not apply, allowing the invocation of the res ipsa loquitur p....
The court clarifies the burden of proof in accident claims, stating that evidence must meet the standard of preponderance of probability rather than beyond a reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.