JUDGMENT :

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J.

By way of the instant revision-petition, the petitioner-defendant (here-in-after to be referred as 'the defendant') has laid challenge to the order (Annexure P-8) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rewari (for short 'the trial Court') on 14.09.2023 in Civil Suit No.164 of 2023 titled as 'Rajeev Kumar Vs. Brij Mohan ', whereby his prayer for the rejection of plaint in view of the provisions contained in Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, has been declined.

2. Shorn and short of unnecessary details, the facts emerging from the perusal of the file and culminating in the filing of the present revision petition, are that the respondent-plaintiff (here-in-after to be referred as 'the plaintiff') filed the afore-referred Civil Suit against the defendant for seeking a decree for the recovery of Rs. 19,20,000/-. In para No.8 of the plaint, he (plaintiff) categorically pleaded that the Court-fee worth Rs. 47,550/- was to be affixed on the plaint but due to insufficiency of the Court-fee stamps, the Suit was being filed with the stamp-paper worth Rs. 50/- and the remaining Court-fee would be paid/affixed later-on. Then, on 02.08.2023, he (plaintiff) m