Back
ALKA SARIN
Bhagwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dalel Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alka Sarin, J.
CM-16872-2019 & CM-16870-2019
1. For the reasons stated therein, the application for condonation of delay in refiling and filing the appeal is allowed. Delay of 61 days in refiling and 15 days in filing the appeal are condoned.
CM-16871-2019
2. The Court fee has already been made good. The present application is disposed off as infructuous.
RSA-5904-2019
3. The present regular second appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellants against concurrent findings of both the Courts below whereby their suit for specific performance has been dismissed.
4. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-appellants filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 14.06.2004 regarding a house built on land bearing Khata No.303/479, Khasra No.1466/1-0, 1641/0-2, measuring 1 Bigha 2 Biswas to the extent of 1/20 share situated at village Batriana for a total sum of Rs. 60,000/- and in the alternative suit for recovery of Rs. 60,000/- being the total amount of sale consideration paid by them to the defendant-respondent, alongwith costs and interest, as also a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendant-respondent from disposs
The central legal point established is that an unregistered agreement to sell cannot confer any title or transfer any interest in immovable property, and the requirement of a registered sale deed und....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of registration requirements under Section 17(1A) of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 and the limitations on filing a suit for s....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for registration of a sale agreement under the Registration Act, 1908, for invoking specific performance, and the significance o....
Unregistered agreement of sale is admissible in suit for specific performance; Section 17(1A) Registration Act applies only to part performance protection under Section 53A TP Act, not to enforcement....
A suit for specific performance necessitates the plaintiff's readiness to fulfill obligations, while unregistered documents cannot substantiate ownership rights unless properly admitted as evidence.
The validity and enforceability of an agreement to sell, as well as the requirements for registration under Section 17(1-A) of the Registration Act, were central to the court's decision.
Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, provides as “Sale” is a transfer of ownership in exchange for a price paid or promised or part paid and part-promised.
An unregistered agreement to sell cannot serve as a basis for injunctive relief against a true owner of property, reflecting the necessity of registration under relevant laws.
(1) Registration of document is not sine qua non for receiving the same as evidence of a contract in a suit for specific performance.(2) Plaintiff can very well make alternative prayer in a suit for ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
