Back
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Haroon Masih – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for bail under section 439 cr.p.c. (Para 1) |
| 2. defense argues inconsistency in the accusations. (Para 2) |
| 3. state claims petitioner involved in administering intoxicant. (Para 3) |
| 4. court finds no direct allegations against petitioner. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. conditions for bail based on trial timeline and witness examination. (Para 6) |
| 6. petitioner released on bail, no opinion on merits. (Para 7) |
| 7. court clarifies non-expression of merit opinion. (Para 8) |
Judgment
Mr. Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.
The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in respect of FIR No.110 dated 29.10.2019 registered under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC ( Sections 473 , 379, 411 and 482 of the IPC added later on) at Police Station Kalanaur, District Gurdaspur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that in the present case, the petitioner has been roped in on the basis of suspicion and that too by alleging a story, which is inconsistent with the actual facts of this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner cannot be roped in either on the basis of the allegations mentioned in the FIR or with regard
The court emphasized that the accused's further incarceration was not required as the veracity of the allegations would be determined during the trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
