Back
DEEPAK SIBAL
Master Ramesh Khatri Lambardar – Appellant
Versus
Surender Panwar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. election petition initiation and facts of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. party contentions regarding election conduct. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. procedural matters regarding election petitions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal requirements for valid election petitions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. supreme court's precedent on election petitions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. insufficient particulars in allegations of corrupt practices. (Para 15 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. conclusion of the court to reject the petition. (Para 24) |
Judgment
Mr. Deepak Sibal, J.
The present order shall dispose of an application filed by the applicant-respondent under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (for short – the Code) read with Section 83 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (for short – the Act) seeking therein rejection of the main election petition on the ground that a reading of the same does not disclose any cause of action.
2. On 21.09.2021 the Election Commission of India (for short – the ECI) announced the dates for holding of Assembly Elections in 31- Sonipat Assembly Constituency in the State of Haryana. The ECI also notified the schedule for the date of issuance of the g
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
