Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
JAISHREE THAKUR
Master Ramesh Khatri Lambardar – Appellant
Versus
Manohar Lal – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JAISHREE THAKUR, J.
1. An election petition has been filed under Sections 77, 77(1), 80-a & 100 (b) & (d-ii & iv), 123, 125 (A), 126, 127-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1951) read with Rules 49C, 86, 89 of the Conduct of Election Rule, 1961 and under Article 324 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration of the result dated 24.10.2019 of the returned candidate i.e. respondent herein, as null and void, with a further prayer to debar the said candidate from contesting election for a period of six years as provided under Section 8 of the Act of 1951.
2. In brief, the facts as stated are that elections were notified to be held in the State of Haryana vide gazette notification dated 27.09.2019. The last date for filing the nomination papers was 04.10.2019; with scrutiny of nomination on 05.10.2019 and last date of withdrawal of candidature on 07.10.2019. Polling commenced on 21.10.2019 and counting of votes and declaration of result were scheduled for 24.10.2019. The petitioner co
The election petition must contain concise material facts and full particulars of any corrupt practice, and failure to disclose even a single material fact would entail dismissal of the election peti....
Allegations of corrupt practice in an election petition must be supported by specific material facts and full particulars as required by Section 83 of the RP Act of 1951. Failure to plead such materi....
Failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding material facts and submission of integral documents renders an election petition dismissible at the threshold.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
Clause (4) of Section 123 of Act shows that publication is required to be reasonably calculated by a candidate or his agent.
Election petitions must allege clear material facts for corrupt practices; mere suspicions and vague allegations do not provide a basis for a trial.
Election petitions must strictly adhere to statutory provisions as alleged corrupt practices must be substantiated with clear material facts, or they are subject to dismissal.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of alleged corrupt practices; failure to do so renders the petition non-maintainable.
Without proper verification and without requisite affidavits cause of action remains incomplete.
Anil Vasudev Salgaonkar Vs. Naresh Kushali Shigaonkar
-
Read summaryPonnala Lakshmaiah Vs. Kommuri Pratap Reddy and others
-
Read summaryG.M. Siddeshwar Vs. Prasanna Kumar
-
Read summaryUmesh Challiyil Vs. K.P. Rajendran
-
Read summaryRam Sukh Vs. Dinesh Aggarwal
-
Read summaryA. Manju Vs. Prajwal Ravanna @ Prajwal R. & others
-
Read summaryManubhai Nandlal Amarsey Vs. Popatlal Manilal Joshi
-
Read summaryHardwari Lal Vs. Kanwal Singh
-
Read summary
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.