SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1432

ALKA SARIN
Sunita Rani – Appellant
Versus
Davinder Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Ms. Swati Verma, Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal

Table of Content
1. revision petition filed under article 227 (Para 1)
2. petitioner's argument on service of summons (Para 2 , 5)
3. respondent's contention on service rules (Para 3 , 7)
4. court's dismissal of the revision petition (Para 4 , 8)
5. procedure for service under order v rule 17 (Para 6)

Judgment

Mrs. Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 23.07.2019 whereby the application filed by respondent No.1 herein under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte eviction order dated 31.05.2012 has been allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the respondent No.1 was duly served inasmuch as the service was affected through his mother. However, she refused to accept the summons and hence it would be deemed service inasmuch as respondent No.1 would be deemed to have knowledge of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that the possession has already been taken by the landlord on 07.11.2014.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has referred to Order V Rule 17 CPC to contend that in case the party on whom

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top