SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1669

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. R.S. Dhillon, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

ALKA SARIN, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.01.2025 passed by the Trial Court whereby the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC filed by the defendant-respondent for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 06.12.2018 was allowed.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff- petitioner herein filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,23,205. The defendant- respondent was proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 09.08.2018 and it was noticed in the said order that despite service none had put in appearance on behalf of the defendant-respondent. Subsequently, ex parte judgment and decree dated 06.12.2018 came to be passed. An application was later on filed by the defendant-respondent under Order IX Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 06.12.2018 wherein it was stated that though in the report, (which has been appended with the present petition as Annexure P-3), it was stated that since the defendant- respondent refused to accept the summons, copy of the same was affixed on the house of the defendant-respondent, however the same did not mention the name of the vill

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top