SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1447

ARUN MONGA
Sandeep Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Parveen Khosla – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Mr. Rajiv Bhatia

Judgment

Mr. Arun Monga, J.

Present revision petition is to set-aside impugned order dated 18.08.2021 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby in a suit instituted by respondent/plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction, application filed by petitioner/defendant under Section 65 of the Indian EVIDENCE ACT for leading secondary evidence by producing photocopy of a Will, was dismissed.

2. Plaintiff/respondent herein has filed a suit for declaration before the Court below to the effect that suit property, is a Joint Hindu Family property and plaintiffs and defendant are co-owners in possession of 1/3rd share each. Transfer deed dated 27.11.2009 allegedly executed by late Surinder Nath Khosla in favour of defendant is illegal, null and void. Further consequential prayer has been made seeking permanent injunction as well.

3. Learned counsel for respondent opposes the petition on the ground that photocopy of Will per se is not admissible. It cannot, therefore, be allowed to be produced in secondary evidence. Qua the said proposition, learned counsel for petitioner is in agreement in law, but states that at the time of filing the applicatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top