SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1728

ARCHANA PURI
Jasmail Singh Sanghera – Appellant
Versus
Sohan Singh Sanghera – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Mr. Rajiv Joshi

Table of Content
1. overview of jurisdiction and factual context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. challenge to admissibility of evidence regarding will. (Para 4 , 5 , 9)
3. necessity for plaintiffs to present evidence timely. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 14 , 16)
4. interpretation of rebuttal rights under cpc. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)
5. revocation of previous order regarding secondary evidence. (Para 17)

Judgment

Mrs. Archana Puri, J.

Through the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court to challenge the order dated 10.05.2018 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Court below, in Civil Suit No.379 dated 18.10.2012, whereby, an application under Section 65 of the Indian EVIDENCE ACT , filed by the respondents has been allowed.

2. The facts, as culled out from the paper-book are that respondents No.1 to 4/plaintiffs had filed a suit for seeking declaration along with defendants No.1 (petitioner) and No.3, to be joint owners in joint possession of the land, as detailed in the head note of the plaint, copy whereof is Annexure P-1. Besides the same, another declaration was sought, thereby, challenging the legality and validity of the sale

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top